Rogueish
The Queen's question is fair – why was Abu Hamza allowed to continue? | Vikram Dodd | Comment is free | guardian.co.uk→
09/27/12
Some may doubt the constitutional propriety of the Queen’s reported intervention in the Hamza case, but it is difficult to fault her question: why was the “preacher of hate” allowed to run free for so long?
IDK, maybe because giving speeches where you call Britain “a toilet” isn’t actually a threat to national security?
