Rogueish

We Need To Talk About (The Intrinsic Fascism Of) Manufactured Pop Music « Echo & Boom

04/09/12

Manufactured pop music cannot serve as a utopian model because it is already part and microcosm of the dystopian economic model of the present.

This is exactly wrong. Manufactured pop music can only serve as a utopian model because it is already part and microcosm of the dystopian economic model of the present.

  1. Loading...

Zone Styx Travelcard

02/23/12

Pop music as we understand it simply did not exist in 1932, and we have no right to blindly assume it will continue to exist as we know it indefinitely. At almost every level the means to produce, distribute, obtain, and consume/absorb (and then discuss/dissect) art has been transformed in the last half century.

I’ve been thinking about this, and the relationship between pop music as an aesthetic form and the music industry as an economic form. The tight connection is indeed what I like about pop music - its production is so closely connection to capitalism that it is uniquely well positioned to comment on capitalism. Pop music really began to exist along with Fordism; are the music industry’s current troubles the result of the end of Fordism finally catching up with it? And if that is the case, will pop music cease to exist along with the music industry? I wonder if, in something like the same way the hippie-tech culture of Silicon Valley became the model for late-neoliberal capitalism in general, ways of producing and distributing music outside the mainstream of the industry, such as Creative Commons netlabels, might provide the model for the future of the music industry. And these outsider forms of music distribution generally have a kind of small-scale, DIY, artisanal style which might fit well with the flex-spec ideology of post-Fordist capitalism, but is unlikely to produce the kind of towering industrial-colossus aesthetic of, say, a Britney Spears.

  1. Loading...

Beyoncé, Gaga, Heterosexism, Feminism and Other Things

12/17/11

microphoneheartbeats:

So I’m in the middle of a Facebook debate with a friend of mine about Beyoncé that was basically provoked by this article, which he agrees with and has led him to broadly assert that Beyoncé “affirms heteronormative heterosexuality as the sole way for girls to assert their sexuality.” That seemed overly reductive to me, and we’ve been bantering back and forth about it. Figured I’d rather compile what I wrote somewhere easier for me to locate than someone else’s Facebook wall. However, I’d be interested in hearing the rest of y’all weigh in on this. Is B thoroughly tied into heteronormativity? Moreso than your average pop or R&B star? Less so? Should she really be, as the article suggests, embracing Gaga-esque positions in her music?

Robin James has written a bunch of great stuff about pop, gender, and race, and Beyoncé specifically, and this post on “Single Ladies” even more specifically.

  1. Loading...