Rogueish
[lbo-talk] Capitalist Domination -- Notes→
03/14/11
In the 1950s and early ’60s campus leisure increased considerably, and college costs were low enough that relatively few students worked very many outside hours. Demands on faculty were relatively light. The phrase “publish or perish” goes back a long ways, but it is remarkable how many full professors even in many major schools had published rather lightly. Certainly no pressure to publish a book for tenure. Faculty had almost feudal privileges in their classrooms, and many classrooms were not much more than bull sessions. There was growing pressure to eliminate freshman composition. (The Harvard professor who originated that monstrosity spent the rest of his life condemning it and hoping for its liquidation. “Writing” bears no relation to even literary intelligence and it is a sort of torture to impose a standardized skill in writing on students as their passport to a semi-decent job. School is leisure or it is not school. That is, if freedom consists in living in the present without being terrorized by the future, and if learning is in any way linked to the freedom of the learner. (Job skills simply don’t belong in schools; they should be part of the job. Probably Marx had this in mind when he suggested that child labor would be part of a good society, that labor of course being plentifully interlaced with learning and just lain loafing.)
Capitalism 4.0 by Anatole Kaletsky | Book review | Books | The Guardian→
08/07/10
The market fundamentalist model, Kaletsky argues, has now run into the sand and will be replaced by Capitalism 4.0, an acceptance that both markets and governments are prone to error. Pragmatism will replace free-market ideology
Except that “pragmatism” is the name of free-market ideology.
[lbo-talk] More "school reform" nonsense→
05/26/10
Damn it. Nothing is more destructive of anything remotely approaching class solidarity than this fucking stupid idea that somehow the incompetent should be “weeded out.” People are not weeds to begin with. Accept the fact that any work force is going to be varied, and rather than this stupid and impossble and divisive obsession with competence give a little bit of thought to performing the best possible with a given work force.
Fundamental to building a good school _system_ would be (a) hiring on the basis of drawing lots amont applicants and (b) immediate and irrevocable tenure, and (c) salary determined by time only — no judgment of this illustory competence.
I don’t think I’ve ever heard anyone propose hiring by drawing lots, but it’s an excellent idea, another twist on “workplace democracy.”
Guest Post: 7 Questions About Public Banking→
03/14/10
Why oh why oh why do money reformers combine perfectly sensible criticisms of the unaccountability of the Fed with anti-semitic conspiracy-theory nutjobbery? That most of the money supply comes from credit extended by banks isn’t some dark secret; it’s a perfectly well-known feature of capitalism. It’s also something that is unavoidable within capitalism; though democratic control over central banks would be a good reformist move, it doesn’t fundamentally alter the commodity character of money.
